HOUGHTON MIFFLIN; 222 PAGES; $25
In "Y: The Descent of Men," Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College in London and author of the much-admired "Darwin's Ghost" and "The Language of Genes," gives us one of the more arresting openers of this spring's crop of nonfiction.
"Ejaculate," he suggests, "if you are so minded and equipped, into a glass of chilled Perrier. There you will see a formless object, but look hard enough -- or at least so eighteenth-century biologists believed -- and a baby appears: the male gift to the female, whose only job is to incubate the child produced with so much labor by her mate. So central seemed a husband's role that his wife was a mere seedbed, a step below him in society, in the household, and, most of all, in herself." All that turned out to be quite wrong, of course.
Men, biologically speaking, are the true second sex, Jones reminds us...Manhood is nothing all that special, but it's complicated. Everybody starts as female. Then a mix of testosterone and the other powerful sex hormones take over, directing the developing Y-child away from its default destiny. Often the results are more ambiguous than people generally assume.
HERE'S THE PART YOU MIGHT ENJOY MOST
"Males are, in many ways, parasites upon their partners," Jones notes. "Their interests are to persuade the other party to invest in reproduction, while doing as little as they can themselves. Like all vermin, from viruses to tapeworms, they force their reluctant landlady to adapt or to be overwhelmed." his subtitle implies, "Y" is in part an echo of Charles Darwin's 1871 classic, "The Descent of Man." Darwin had in mind, mostly, our origin as a species, and he got much of that right. He erred, though, in assuming that social relations in general, and the male's lordly status in particular, were immutable products of natural selection.Jones did a good job of checking the latest facts, and concludes: "Gender differences have been consumed by social change. We are in the midst of an ascent of women matched with an equivalent descent of men." So we are invited to lots of baby showers, but the biological relevance of the male in reproduction is questionable -- sperm, for instance, may soon be cranked out from stem cells, cutting men out of the deal altogether. "
RELATED ARTICLES
"Boys are Stupid" Campaign and Glenn Sacks
Riveting open letter of debate to Glenn Sacks on his unapologetically sympathetic views toward men. Ed Babinski draws the comparison between hardships women face worldwide, through history and present day vs. those of males.Male vs. Female Brain: Aptitude and Intelligence
What does science say about the differences in male vs. female brain, who is intellectually superior to whom?Discrimination in the Job Market
Civil Rights issues and discrimination in the job market. Taking a look at statistics on the availability of employment and advancement for women and minorities like in the early twenty first century.Male vs. Female Brain Chemistry - Pornography, Sex and Hypothalamus
What science has concluded about the male brain chemistry differences in contrast to the female brain and what pornographers claim to be true. Evolution and how the differences came to be. Why Pornographers have been getting away with distributing films and photography that give a grossly negligent and misleading portrayal of true female sexuality.Evolution and Male Aggression: Double Standards Just Good Ole' Monkey Business
Babinski's dangerous comments on the all too familiar teachings in holy books, females being there to serve and obey males, which is ALSO the message of the apes of the secular world as well. Some history on persecution of woman, past and present.
Article last updated October 22, 2005
Certified error free by http://htmlvalidator.com
 |
 |